Shadowrun 5e specialized character sheet
![shadowrun 5e specialized character sheet shadowrun 5e specialized character sheet](https://i.imgur.com/1SYx3qW.jpg)
Even rarer are the instances when they actually kill them. Rarely are women described as being physically violent to children.
![shadowrun 5e specialized character sheet shadowrun 5e specialized character sheet](https://img.yumpu.com/39838866/1/500x640/two-page-character-sheet-shadowrun.jpg)
There is also an interesting Double Standard when it comes to characters to which this trope applies, since they are almost Always Male. However, teenagers harming children qualifies. Violence to teenagers, with the exception of some of those in their early teens, isn't an example either since teenagers are physically stronger than children and lack the "completely defenseless" element, especially if Teens Are Monsters. The following are not examples: psychological/verbal abuse ( very common but not that trope), abduction (only applies if the child dies or gets effectively hurt), depriving a child of food (that's Denied Food as Punishment and only counts as this trope if taken to the point where the child is at risk of serious harm from lack of food), child on child violence (unless adults are forcing the children to hurt each other, that's Kids Are Cruel), exploitation for profit by the parents if they aren't hurt (that is Financial Abuse). Important Note: This trope is about adults physically hurting children, or deliberately placing them in life-threatening situations, fatally or not. In Japanese fiction, child brutality may be more common but is often framed in a very specific way (again, to conform to their S&P) and has actually faded somewhat in the new millennium over content concerns. In Western works, this trope is rare and almost always done off-panel when played straight (read: when the violence towards the child isn't being stopped in the nick of time and causes actual damage) largely due to broadcast standards it's a little more common in literature but still not very much so. Naturally, the Friend to All Children sees this type of character as a mortal enemy, with an exception sometimes for religious figures in some cases. This may also be done by a Complete Monster to establish that even a villain has lines they won't dare cross. Hurting said children will look much less like a Moral Event Horizon crossing, even though there will always be some Moral Guardians or Papa Wolf / Mama Bear to complain.
![shadowrun 5e specialized character sheet shadowrun 5e specialized character sheet](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/41/44/d8/4144d85463951b5b757a206dfcb7b78e.png)
Does a soldier shooting a child soldier still seem like an ultimate villain?Īnd want to go all the way? Make the children creepy or, even better, make them Enfants Terrible. However, it is surprisingly easy to subvert this trope simply by using Kids Are Cruel (the flip side of Children Are Innocent) and combining it with Pay Evil unto Evil. Hence, the presence of Would Hurt A Child is often telltale of a Crapsack World or at least a Darker and Edgier series. This trope is almost always a Kick the Dog moment. Indeed, the act of harming a child usually comes off as the ultimate act of villainy. And, they do hurt children, sometimes even kill them, in defiance of the Improbable Infant Survival. This creed exists for various reasons: it may be because Children Are Innocent, and thus should be protected and kept out of harm's way at all costs it may be because, to Moral Guardians, seeing a child being brutalized is Harmful to Minors and thus should be avoided it may also be because even writers mostly disagree with the idea of writing about harming a child.īut sometimes, some people just don't agree with that. In fiction and in the media, both heroes and villains often agree on one thing: they Wouldn't Hurt a Child. Sol Badguy (to an unconscious May), Guilty Gear Xrd